Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 04-16-2011, 07:25 AM   #1
Weekend Camper
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Indiana
Posts: 39

I have read a lot of information on both this and "the other" forum about how to correctly set up a WD hitch. There is a wealth of information out there, but have been wondering about how it may apply to my configuration.

Most of the guides out there tell you that a properly adjusted WD hitch will cause both the front and back of your truck to settle by the same amount (or that the back should settle by no more than 1" further than the front). My question is does this general rule of thumb also apply to a sport model truck that typically rides with the back 1.5" higher than the front?

Details: I have a 2001 Dodge Dakota "Sport" model (Quad-cab 4x4 with the 4.7 liter V8). By itself the front wheel well measures 36" and the back wheel well measures 37.5". With the trailer connected and the WD bars engaged as configured by the dealer the truck sits perfectly level with both the front and back wheel wells measuring 36". Unfortunately I have the maximum number of links dangling free on the EAZ-lift trunion bars, so I unable to engage the bars any further without adjusting the hitch-ball assembly to tilt further down.

My question is - is it worth it to go through the trouble of adjusting the hitch-ball assembly so that I can attempt to get both the front and back of my truck to settle by the same amount, or is it acceptable in this case since the truck sits perfectly level?

Thanks as always for the great advice everyone provides!

Edited by: scottw
2007 Yukon Denali

2011 Slingshot 29BHS
scottw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-16-2011, 01:01 PM   #2
Full Time Camper
Stan's Avatar
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Oak Harbor, WA
Posts: 2,008
I always had my suburban and TT set so that both units sat level. That gave me the best ride on both smooth and bumpy roads. The real test is if the front wheels are "too light" on the road which could cause loss of steering in rain or on bumpy roads.

Stan and Terri
Oak Harbor, WA
2008 Chevy 2500HD D/A
2007 Cruiser CF30SK
Glide Ride Pin Box
Reese 16K Slider
Stan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-25-2011, 11:36 AM   #3
Full Time Camper
ewbldavis's Avatar
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Canton, OH
Posts: 937
The even settling of your truck is valid even ona sport model with a steep "rake" (rear is higher than the front). You are distributing the weight evenly, so truck should settle evenly (maybe a bit more on the rear, but not much).

Our Trailblazer EXT has a steep rake, but front/rear drop about the same. This keeps weight on your steers...muy importanto
ewbldavis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-25-2011, 11:47 AM   #4
Full Time Camper
anaro's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Mebane, NC
Posts: 2,394
From what I understand (keep in mind I am a newbie and going off of what i have recently learned)... the front and back should have close to the same amount of change (ie front changes by 1" and back changes by 1"). Another way to do it is to go to scales and weigh your loaded truck w/o the trailer to get a weight on each axle. THen reweigh w/ TT attached. Your goal is to get the front axle back to as close to original weight as possible.

2014 Chevy Silverado 3500 SRW Duramax
2011 Zinger ZT26BL-sold
2014 Sabre 34REQS

***Member of the Mason-Dixon Group***
anaro is offline   Reply With Quote

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

» Featured Campgrounds

Reviews provided by

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3

This website is not affiliated with or endorsed by Crossroads RV or any of its affiliates. This is an independent, unofficial site.

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:27 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.