Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
 
Old 03-03-2011, 02:07 PM   #1
Weekend Camper
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location:
Posts: 34


I'm considering a Slingshot that does not have an enclosed underbelly. I have the option to order one that does have an enclosed underbelly for likely more $$$, what'sthe realized benefit?

Thanks

J
jgourley is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-03-2011, 10:36 PM   #2
Full Time Camper
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location:
Posts: 1,415
If your going to camp in cold weather you may want one. We have slep in our camper at 18 degrees with no problem without an enclosed underbelly. If you have a problem with the undernieth you can get to things easier. To me it is your choice.
cwit is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2011, 12:40 AM   #3
Weekend Camper
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Valdosta Ga
Posts: 82
My 2 cents worth is to spring for the $200. It will help keep it warm if needed and also helps keep it clean and easier to critter proof. As stated, the down side is it makes access more difficult but then how often to you need access?
__________________
2010 F350 SRW SWB FX4 Diesel

2011 Seville VF36SB

http://i1130.photobucket.com/albums/...mi/Seville.jpg
GaPete is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2011, 01:37 PM   #4
Family Vacation Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location:
Posts: 245
Everyone except the one we have now has not had the cover under them.I can see where there is some benfit for very cold weather, but I think its a place for mice to live while they find a hole to get inside.Its a bad place to try and stop ants and as said if there is a problem you cant see it.If the floor squeks, you can't fix it without removing the cover.It does cover the tanks and pipes, and seems to be on most mid and upper level campers and use to you didn't see that many in this area.It is neater looking under the camper with the bottom covered.As said your choice. I don't think you can go wrong either way.
__________________
2005 F-250

2009 Cruiser 29RK
FB1965 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2011, 01:05 AM   #5
Family Vacation Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: DeSoto,KS
Posts: 125
I think they say you better gas mileage with the under side enclosed also. Less wind resistance I guess.
__________________

2009 CT31RL

2016 Chevrolet 2500HD High Country

Hensley Hitch
ajlight is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2011, 12:50 PM   #6
Weekend Camper
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location:
Posts: 34
Thanks for the inputs, I'm probably going to pull the trigger on a Slingshot 32QB tomorrow.
jgourley is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


» Virginia Campgrounds

Reviews provided by

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:44 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.